Remember, in these times when Cameroon WhatsApp Number List can easily find tracks of delay in France; “ The Covid vaccine policy ”, “ a remote class system incapable of holding the first day a year later …”, there is a position in which France has not been unworthy for a few years, Open data. We thus see France in 2 nd European position (behind the United Kingdom) or 3 rd world position (Canada in addition to the United Kingdom) according to an international ranking of 115 countries, the Open data barometer [1] . The Digital Republic Act of 2016 established the principle of an obligation by default to publish data processed by public services (except GDPR and business secrets).

However, as the experience with open data and its public producers reminds us, the law is not always enough to have transformed all public actors into producers of open data. However, the most advanced communities understand the link between the openness of their data and the impact on the economic ecosystem and their image for citizens, in a word their attractiveness . To return to the Bothorel report, the report recalls the interests of opening up data, which has several interests: The report indicates that the openness is not yet satisfactory to show the full potential of the policy. Bluntly, which is quite rare for a document of this type, the report talks about the brakes:

France at the forefront of Open Data

We all follow the statistics of the state of health of the French population, made available almost every day since the start of the pandemic. International tools exist and numerous citizen and company initiatives have flourished in recent months. The one I wanted to indicate is a remarkable initiative: Created by a student from public data, Guillaume Rozier has contributed as a citizen and data scientist to making statistics accessible, via simple visualizations. Out-of-date document models and underperforming document fusion automations. Users easily see an added value in the use of document templates offered by the system. However, if these are not up to date or certain data cannot be automatically integrated


the advantage can quickly become a disadvantage. The management of document models must therefore be manageable… and administered. In terms of fusion fields: either you have to aim for frugality or even abstinence, or you aim high in terms of quality and documentary productivity, but in return these fusion fields must be perfectly administered to be up to date and to function perfectly … Attention danger ! The poor ergonomics of the system. Users do not all have the same criteria for judgment (for example, one-off users will favor intuitiveness, daily users favor performance). However, the ergonomics must be generally good for all types of users to avoid losing users or categories of users

The brakes are not yet all raised

The impact of the qualified signature on the validation / signature process.The conditions to be met for the qualified signature are draconian and technologically complex. They involve certificates issued by trusted third parties who are themselves certified. Certificates that must be installed on their workstation. Certificates that require hardware that must also be certified by these same bodies … It is therefore important to assess and segment the signature needs to separate the documents requiring simple electronic signatures (not qualified in the eIDAS sense) from electronic signatures (qualified in the eIDAS sense). Also, be careful, regulations and tools are evolving very quickly on this subject and the emergence of de facto standards should not be disdained.

The workstations. Quite often the discourse of publishers is to say that their application is Full Web when the reality is that it is Full Web… 99% and the 1% that is missing is unfortunately what document management software often needs. Keep in mind that if something does not work, it does not matter whether it is a problem with the configuration of your workstation, your internet browser, your pdf viewer, the GED / GEC application, … for users it is your dematerialized management system that does not work. It is therefore necessary to check the configuration and settings of the workstations because dematerialization solutions have a lot of interactions with the workstation, in particular to display or support the modification of documents on installed tools.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.