A first example is linked to the Benin WhatsApp Number List of Cloud computing. We remove the physical servers of a company, to install them in data centers of Cloud players, infinitely more secure and more available, and much less expensive. Incidentally, we automate a large number of administrative tasks, physical management, purchasing, renewal of machines, all things long and expensive if we want it to work well and sustainably. Everyone is practicing this way now. It is comparable to the adoption of an EdF contract in exchange for the management of generator sets for oneself. No one, except in very special cases, would have the idea of ​​having their generators if they can be connected to the electricity network.

We have seen many examples where the transformations we were proposing gave rise to reactions that were at first glance astonishing. But when they realize this, customers suddenly realize: “So what will become of my 10 production operators? I, who am the leader of this team, which I have known for years, what will become of them? “. Good question ! And it is not up to the local manager to answer them alone, he has not necessarily been trained in this, his job is to “manage the production”, not to design and lead reorganizations. The worst thing I have seen done is… do nothing. The cloud migration project takes place.

Why such behavior

10 people have nothing more to do, but we keep the positions and salaries without saying or doing anything. And with the best intentions in the world: “with us we do not lay off.” The bottom line is that people with no work and no prospects come to work and get paid for doing nothing, and some end up in depression. Another example: a very large project automates the task of hundreds of people, making machines do tedious work. For fear of a social conflict, the decision-makers, instead of carrying out a plan, admittedly complex, of reorganization, to find a new job for these hundreds of people, decided … to have the work of the machines visually checked .

Benin-Whatsapp-Number-List

Such examples are innumerable. COVID will accelerate this. Instead of realizing that jobs will disappear, and assuming that transformation is necessary, easy for some, very complicated for others, we do not name things, we deny them, we delay them, or we do them Like nothing ever happened. And instead of helping people to live and prosper in a new world, we refuse to go there, we do as before, we keep ways of doing things that no longer need to be. And we anchor people in situations, sometimes going as far as suffering. In medicine, when there are no more therapeutic remedies, i.e. no known treatment possible.

How to do ? What to do

and the pain is there, palliative care is provided: the pain is reduced or eliminated, physical and psychological, with medication. The indication for palliative care treatment is indeed: “there is no longer any therapeutic remedy”. However, in the digital transitions that we are living, there is a plethora of remedies! You have to bend down to pick them up. I recently heard people say: “IT has been suppressing IT jobs for 50 years, I’ve been seeing a shortage of IT staff for 50 years”. Admittedly, not all the same jobs for 50 years. Such behaviors can be explained because we are not all equal when it comes to change. Professor Riveline, head of the scientific management center at the Ecole des Mines de Paris

The first thing to do is to name things, to assume them: “Yes, there is going to be a transformation. Yes it will upset the balance in place ”, sometimes for a very long time. “Yes, we will have to adapt. No, it won’t be easy for everyone ”. Also assume: “We have no choice. If we don’t do this today, we may not be here tomorrow ”. “Others, who adopt more efficient practices, will go faster, cheaper, will continue to have more customers and those who refuse the change will have fewer and will disappear with it. And it will be worse than changing a little now. A little pain today to avoid death tomorrow. Eternal difficulty to arbitrate between a certain immediate loss, against a hypothetical more serious loss in the uncertain future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.